W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > November 2011

RE: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa?

From: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:26:59 -0800
Message-ID: <SNT143-W17F4394ECB67412CD2B02A92CF0@phx.gbl>
CC: "public-xg-webid@w3.org" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>

All I did was cut and paster a paragraph from a spec into an blog post (albeit on blogger, with a customized template) let me know when there is an RP somewhere. You can try my keys by using the .p12 here: <iframe title ="Preview" scrolling="no" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" frameborder="0" style="width:98px;height:115px;padding:0;background-color:#fcfcfc;" src="https://skydrive.live.com/embedicon.aspx/Public/anon.p12.pfx?cid=05061d4609325b60&sc=documents"></iframe> I spent 3h making that first cert - since its 2+ years since I used this MSFT tool chain. I had to figure out all the security gotchas again, that always make everything miserable. I edited the blog post to put the modulus from the cert in the blog post, omitting leading zero(s). anyone with windows 2008 R2 with an enterprise config can repeat these steps. So, far zero custom software used. Will get back to the ASP.NET RP sometime tomorrow. Will be using Kingsleys cert verifier service, which issues a signed auth response, when only RDFa represnetation seems to exists - since I have no dotnet RDFa lib (and it aint my job to make one). > From: henry.story@bblfish.net
> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 20:26:23 +0100
> CC: public-xg-webid@w3.org
> To: kidehen@openlinksw.com
> Subject: Re: how dirty can the HTML be, and still be RDFa?
> 
> 
> On 25 Nov 2011, at 20:05, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> 
> > On 11/25/11 1:55 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> >> Next, I am going to test (X)HTML+RDFa.
> > 
> > New blog post re. the above:
> > 
> > Permalink: http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2011/11/webid-details-via-xhtmlrdfa.html
> 
> Kingsley, can you try to stick with the current spec? What you have just produced in both cases is the old way of writing things. Peter did it very well in his first attempt by using the template we have put up there
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#rdfa-html-notation
> 
> I am just transforming all the services I have developed to only accept what is in the spec, which you voted for recently yourself.
> 
> Henry
> 
> 
> > 
> > Source:
> > <div
> > xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
> > xmlns:cert="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/cert#"
> > xmlns:rsa="http://www.w3.org/ns/auth/rsa#"> <dl typeof="rsa:RSAPublicKey">
> > <dt>WebId</dt>
> > <dd href="http://id.myopenlink.net/about/id/entity/http/twitter.com/kidehen" rel="cert:identity">
> >    http://id.myopenlink.net/about/id/entity/http/twitter.com/kidehen
> > </dd>
> > <dt>Modulus (hexadecimal)</dt>
> > <dd property="rsa:modulus" datatype="cert:hex">
> >    d0bbdd16b3322bfae8957f257b7a76870afa8852625c230652ef93f2ee29893564ade5
> >    b2caddd82ac3cafd6bca908a2fae42f2771c1072dd5bf67f9335779c03ddc33343707f
> >    1c0b6cc77c8f602a6686ec161700d8b0650d2d7fa4d7f6342c42749cda715c3755fee0
> >    e83a0e43b288a9749482e0507862b1cb41067c1d2d4de1bb420bf543f233fb70bf64e7
> >    4b44a6605491e0a65242286a1ada43ec4a9d8a2162bec15c8faf9759bd8e8d3571db2f
> >    01a09c7063567bc77fe27bb4d532de9d3aeb3619c03924b0b08810653d5c618a7d8d31
> >    a34534d9b2ce6b3ea6df993d00509b7b52a6124ae90c8073f0248bdd02c15e82b9a0de
> >    9a3df19788599be0ed2d3d
> > </dd>
> > <dt>Exponent (decimal)</dt>
> > <dd property="rsa:public_exponent" datatype="cert:int">65537</dd>
> > </dl>
> > </div>
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Kingsley Idehen	
> > Founder&  CEO
> > OpenLink Software
> > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 
> 
 		 	   		  
Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 20:27:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 November 2011 20:27:29 GMT