W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > November 2011

Re: ask and you shall be redirected

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:57:29 -0500
Message-ID: <4ECFE519.5050105@openlinksw.com>
To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 11/25/11 1:25 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> Personally, I just would have SPARQL or RDF in the spec. They would 
> surface is related documents about implementation examples since one 
> can clearly group implementations by approaches etc..
>
> WebID is AWWW technology. Thus, it doesn't have to pull in SPARQL and 
> RDF at the spec level. 
Meant to say:

Personally, I just *wouldn't* have SPARQL or RDF in the spec. They would 
surface is related documents about implementation examples since one can 
clearly group implementations by approaches etc..

WebID is AWWW technology. Thus, it doesn't have to pull in SPARQL and 
RDF at the spec level.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 19:07:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 25 November 2011 19:07:52 GMT