- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:57:29 -0500
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4ECFE519.5050105@openlinksw.com>
On 11/25/11 1:25 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: > Personally, I just would have SPARQL or RDF in the spec. They would > surface is related documents about implementation examples since one > can clearly group implementations by approaches etc.. > > WebID is AWWW technology. Thus, it doesn't have to pull in SPARQL and > RDF at the spec level. Meant to say: Personally, I just *wouldn't* have SPARQL or RDF in the spec. They would surface is related documents about implementation examples since one can clearly group implementations by approaches etc.. WebID is AWWW technology. Thus, it doesn't have to pull in SPARQL and RDF at the spec level. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder& CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Friday, 25 November 2011 19:07:52 UTC