W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > November 2011

Re: different publish RDF in section 2.4.2

From: Mo McRoberts <mo.mcroberts@bbc.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:56:10 +0000
Cc: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6ED4B1B6-4722-4DE7-BF7B-75FB6BD771B1@bbc.co.uk>
To: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>

On 23 Nov 2011, at 11:00, Dominik Tomaszuk wrote:

> In buttom of section 2.4.2 there is:
> "If a WebID provider would rather prefer not to mark up his data in RDFa, but just provide a human readable format for users and have the RDF graph appear in a machine readable format such as RDF/XML then he may publish the link from the HTML to a machine readable format (it this is available at a dedicated URI) as follows:
> 
> <html>
> <head>
> <link type="rel" type="application/rdf+xml" href="profile.rdf"/>
> </head>
> <body> ...  </body>
> </html>
> "
> 
> My comments:
> 1) 'type="rel" type="application/rdf+xml"' is not valid, it should be:
> rel="meta" type="application/rdf+xml"

rel="meta", not rel="alternate"? (we are talking about an HTML page containing a human-readable representation of the same information, right?)

-- 
Mo McRoberts - Technical Lead - The Space,
0141 422 6036 (Internal: 01-26036) - PGP key CEBCF03E,
Project Office: Room 7083, BBC Television Centre, London W12 7RJ
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 11:56:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 November 2011 11:56:40 GMT