- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 16:53:21 -0400
- To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 5/5/11 2:21 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > The storage mechanism in our particular implementation was chosen just > because it was the simplest way to implement what we wanted. There is > nothing, as far as we can see, that should couple the storage mechanism > to the WebID specification. So yes, we can give people that choice - but > many people are just going to choose the default. This matter is becoming a top priority now that some infrastructure failure points have been addressed. For example, you can use HTML5 WebDB to talk SPASQL to a data space (which can take the form of an RDBMS, Graph DBMS, a file etc..). The channel question will be secured too via WebID. What we'll end up doing is making Flash storage an option :-) Links: 1. http://wikis.openlinksw.com/dataspace/owiki/wiki/UdaWikiWeb/InstallConfigODBCHTML5Bridge - HTML5 WebDB to ODBC Bridges (so SPASQL has a pinhole and more ) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 20:53:44 UTC