Re: Our paper for Federated Social Web Europe Conference

On 01.05.2011 02:13, bergi wrote:
> I've found four things I would add/change in the document:
>
> Add an example in N3 to show how simple the ontology is.
I will. It is in TODO list.

> Add an URL to the RDF schema. Some people like the written words others
> prefer machine readable formats ;-)
It is also in TODO list.

> The conclusion that the ontology is browser independent isn't really an
> unique feature.
Agree.

> If it is you should go more into details (read/write as
> simplified version of HTTP methods?).
I used [2] vocabluary.

> If you have already plans for access control for triples you could also
> include this feature which makes it more interesting for other use cases.
I think it will be future work.

>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#sparqlTriplePatterns
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF/

Regards,

Dominik Tomaszuk

Received on Sunday, 1 May 2011 09:29:19 UTC