- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 05:54:58 +0200
- To: dev-identity@lists.mozilla.org
- Cc: Tom Scavo <trscavo@gmail.com>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 18 Jul 2011, at 05:49, Henry Story wrote: >> >> An e-mail address is not privacy preserving. It is a globally unique >> identifier that is correlatable across relying parties. Thus your >> conclusion does not hold. The identifier would have to be opaque and >> per-RP for your argument to make sense. > > A lot of people don't want to get into spam registries. The privacy > advantage of http URLs is that you can send e-mails using them. So Of course that should be: "you can not send e-mail using them" > one could argue that http URLs are more privacy enhancing :-) Henry Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Monday, 18 July 2011 03:55:38 UTC