W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > January 2011

RE: Documenting implicit assumptions?

From: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:07:04 -0800
Message-ID: <SNT143-w48ABCC771D979D8A71F7792E20@phx.gbl>
CC: <public-xg-webid@w3.org>

On the original topic, we might encourage anyone with an interest to go write in 30m or less 10-15 paragraphs describing their ideal webid protocol.
 
Lets have a look at the use of language, the expectations, and folks starter modifications to the world contemplated by FOAF+SSL.
 
Here is one attempt that took me less than 30m. It captures something of things I dont like about Henry's conception - understanding that its just a strawman.
http://yorkporc.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/foafssl-variation-secure-following-theorem-crt-files/
 
Ill have a go at my latest thoughts, focussing on non RSA ciphersuites - mostly since Henry's conception of the web seems obsessed with RSA. Lets see what life looks like when RSA is not even in the picture (as in most if not all of DoD).
  		 	   		  
Received on Monday, 31 January 2011 23:07:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 31 January 2011 23:07:40 GMT