W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > February 2011

Re: slow down and organize

From: Reto Bachmann-Gmür <reto.bachmann@trialox.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:06:45 +0100
To: nathan@webr3.org, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1298488005.1461.6.camel@Nokia-N900-51-1>
Hi Nathan

48 issues haven been raised, but this doesn't mean we should focus on all of them, in fact only one issue (architecture) has yet been opened.

cheers,
reto

----- Original message -----
> Hi All,
> 
> I admit it, I've lost track - to be honest I think almost everybody has, 
> can somebody who hasn't lost track write up a mail explaining where we 
> are now?
> 
> I strongly feel we need to get a grip of the issues, group them 
> together, work out what's in scope and what's out of scope, focus on 
> some things and start getting a good sense of where we actually are, 
> perhaps it's just me, but really, at the moment I don't have a clue, it 
> almost feels like we've moved discussions in to re architecturing a huge 
> chunk of internet security, rather than WebID (which I've always taken 
> to mean Web Identification / Web Identifiers).
> 
> There are currently 48 issues, and there is no order of precedence, no 
> real dependencies listed, and no kind of grouping. We need to sorth that.
> 
> Additionally, the volume of mail is such that I certainly can't keep up, 
> and when I try to half the mails make no sense as they're completely out 
> of context - my main worry is that I devote about 80 hours a week to the 
> w3c groups, and if I can't make head nor tail of it, how can anybody
> else?
> 
> Can we do something about this, either discuss on list or hold an 
> interim clean-up / focus meeting asap.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Nathan
> 
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 19:10:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:22 UTC