- From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:38:13 -0800
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>, WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>, keyassure@ietf.org
Henry: It feels like you are pushing for DANE and WebID to have "bare public key" as a way of doing certificate identification without justification for how this could be useful in DANE. Without taking any stance on WebID, I find this frustrating as the document co-author in DANE. The two protocols do not have the same targets and do not even run over the same transports. Could you please re-split the discussion and, in the DANE part, be much more specific about how you see bare public keys in DANE being used with just TLS? Thanks!
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2011 15:38:58 UTC