- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 00:56:36 +0100
- To: Daniel Renfer <duck@kronkltd.net>
- Cc: foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
On 5 February 2011 03:42, Daniel Renfer <duck@kronkltd.net> wrote: > Wouldn't the fact that it's able to access other resources imply that > it is an Agent of some sort? The interpretation of what it takes to be > an agent might need to be a bit broader then what it currently is. I havent considered all possibilities of this but let's take an example. An online account ( foaf : account ) has access to a bulletin board. Now AIUI an online account is normally disjoint from an Agent? > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Melvin Carvalho > <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: >> You know it's month 1 of an XG when people start asking for definitions :) >> >> Do we have WebID (distinct from The WebID Protocol [1], and The WebID >> Profile [2]) defined anywhere? >> >> It used to have domain of foaf : Agent, but I think now is any URI? >> >> In the world of URIs (tho universal does not imply unique), It strikes >> me that any URI that points to a resource, that may need access, to >> any other URI, has use for this technology? >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#the-webid-protocol >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#the-webid-profile >> _______________________________________________ >> foaf-protocols mailing list >> foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org >> http://lists.foaf-project.org/mailman/listinfo/foaf-protocols >> >
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 23:57:08 UTC