- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:42:06 +0000
- To: Peter Williams <home_pw@msn.com>
- CC: public-xg-webid@w3.org
Peter Williams wrote: > > There is an issue here. > > The scheme in [1] argues for passwords (unphisable ones) - saying certs and the like are too hard > > The issue is "websso". > > The biggest problem any consumer talks about (anyone ever talk to them?) is that they dont want 50 passwords - which is the situation today. > > Do we accept the "authentication silo" as an issue - albeit a cultural one? > > Even if I had the miracle of MutualAuth, do I really want 50 passwords, on 34 different password regimes, and 14 differnet lifecycles, and 3 different uses of email for recovery? I won't really know what you want, but when I view twitter i don't want to have to enter a password, when I view my bank account I do, and in both cases I want webid. Layering :) one does not preclude the other.
Received on Friday, 4 February 2011 17:43:21 UTC