W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > December 2011

Re: Turtle support for WebID profiles

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 10:24:34 +0100
Cc: Patrick Logan <patrickdlogan@gmail.com>, WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <4EFE33C9-BC35-4989-ADC9-11ADFD7D1B8B@bblfish.net>
To: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>

On 23 Dec 2011, at 06:44, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote:

> 
> 
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote:
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1. I do not see any issues off hand for moving Turtle forward. What is next?
> 
> could you ask on the LinkedData list, or find some way of getting people
> there to vote?  Well turtle support will get full support I believe,
> but the more difficult question is after that should one drop RDF/XML as a must
> support? Or should one have both? I don't find it difficult to do both.
> 
> We should leave RDF/XML as a MUST (on verifier side), even for all its cons, most libs support it (I don't know of any RDF lib which support Turtle but RDF/XML for example). If anything, we could simply remove the ugly RDF/XML snippet from the spec.

Ah that's a good idea. 

MUST support by consumer, deprecate for user.

I like the idea.

Henry
Received on Friday, 23 December 2011 09:25:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 23 December 2011 09:25:05 GMT