W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > December 2011

Re: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:05:39 -0500
Message-ID: <4EF31D13.6040705@openlinksw.com>
To: public-xg-webid@w3.org
On 12/21/11 7:08 PM, Peter Williams wrote:
>
>
> _http://wp.me/p1fcz8-1J7_  suggests a necessary bug fix, so openilink 
> with webid/openid can talk to Azure - and then realty, and everywhere 
> realty reaches as bridging IDP (which is a LONG WAY).
> well done, Kingsley (and team). Good days work, connecting the 
> semantic web to reality (and realty).

Peter,

Re., question posed in your post, it should be: 
http://specs.openid.net/auth/2.0/server . The issue has been fixed.

Also, did you verify you WebID using the verifier at: 
http://id.myopenlink.net/ods/webid_demo.html ?

Kingsley
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: home_pw@msn.com
> To: kidehen@openlinksw.com; foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org; 
> public-xg-webid@w3.org
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:17:42 -0800
> Subject: RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service
>
>
>
> I tried it with sourcforge, and the result was the same as with an 
> RPX-powered (at amazone) RP.
>
> I also tried to bind the openlink IDP (with webid) to the Azure 
> bridge, but failed; as summarized here: _http://wp.me/p1fcz8-1J7_
>
> The site really needs to be (and claim to be) v2. Ill guess this is 
> the crux of the issues.
>
> but, it all looks good. Just some minor fiddles required, I suspect. 
> Wont be long before webid is (indirectly) powering a SAML2 protocol 
> exchange to the academic networks. of course, they have had client 
> certs  and https client authn inducing a SAML exchange for years (in a 
> profile focussed on ldap as the repository of the graph). But, this 
> will be cuter; as its all native semweb.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: home_pw@msn.com
> To: kidehen@openlinksw.com; foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org; 
> public-xg-webid@w3.org
> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:46:48 -0800
> Subject: RE: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service
>
> Which RP site should I try, ideally?
>
> My trial results, at _http://wp.me/p1fcz8-1Im_
>
> > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:36:45 -0500
> > From: kidehen@openlinksw.com
> > To: foaf-protocols@lists.foaf-project.org; public-xg-webid@w3.org
> > Subject: WebID+OpenID Proxy Service
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I've dropped a note about the above at: http://goo.gl/zC7tP .
> >
> > It's basically a decoupling of what we had in ODS re. WebID+OpenID
> > delivered in a manner similar to: http://openid4.me .
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Kingsley Idehen
> > Founder& CEO
> > OpenLink Software
> > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen








Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 12:06:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 December 2011 12:06:16 GMT