W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Position Paper for W3C Workshop on Identity

From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:43:35 +0200
Cc: WebID XG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EE9E001B-E2BC-4F2A-84C7-842F4A912109@deri.org>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>

On 21 Apr 2011, at 17:40, Henry Story wrote:

> 
> On 21 Apr 2011, at 16:56, Alexandre Passant wrote:
> 
>> Hi Henry,
>> 
>> I've added some comments to the google doc yesterday, do you plan to integrate them.
> 
> I was looking through the history of the google doc changes yesterday, but I can't find them. I think I saw them before, but my browsers currently don't show me anything in those diffs. 
> 
>> I think we shall mention somewhere the ties between WebID and FOAF (or any machine readable data about the WebID owner)
> 
> I do mention foaf once there. We don't have any space left there now I think.
> 
>> Since we're talking about identity, we shall mention that WebID allows 
>> (1) a user to give some of its information to an application (where s/he's authenticating) in a machine-readable form and
>> (2) an application (where someone logs in) to deliver some data based on the identify and the attributes
>> 
>> Multiple advantages: fight spam, contextual information delivery, personalisation etc.
> 
> Fighting spam is there in section 4.
> Does that cover what you were looking for?

Kind of, but I think there should be more emphasis on it (using the previous combination) as part of section 3.
To me, the tie to a "machine readable profile" is a key advantage of WebID that should be streghten here

Alex.

> 
>> 
>> m2c
>> 
>> Alex.
>> 
>> On 21 Apr 2011, at 12:51, Henry Story wrote:
>> 
>>> New version with some changes:
>>> 
>>> http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/04/21/
>>> 
>>> The old one is here
>>> 
>>> http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/04/20/
>>> 
>>> Is there a web diff tool?
>>> 
>>> Henry
>>> 
>>> On 21 Apr 2011, at 11:26, Harry Halpin wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 04/21/2011 10:41 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>>>>> Harry, are videos allowed in a submission?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Btw. doing a good video is even more work that writing a good text out, as it requires excellence in an even larger set of media voice, music, film, writing.
>>>> 
>>>> Feel free to link to a video that you can show in your presentation. The video cannot replace a position paper, which requires text.
>>>> 
>>>> HOWEVER, if you do get a video in with your paper, we might make a separate video part of the workshop homepage if enough people ping me with video requests. We've had about 3 others say this before. The idea would be people could watch the video before the workshop, to help start a conversation ASAP.  We want people at the workshop primed and ready to go.
>>>> 
>>>>> Henry
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 21 Apr 2011, at 10:33, Alexandre Passant wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Links in the addendum or references sections or via anchored text, as per normal practice. If you have a live link, you negate the constraints of digital rendition of paper :-)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Since papers can be submitted in HTML, embedding a video is also an option to make the case of WebID.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Alex.
>>>>> Social Web Architect
>>>>> http://bblfish.net/
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Social Web Architect
>>> http://bblfish.net/
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 15:44:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:24 UTC