- From: Jeff Sayre <jeff@sayremedia.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 14:21:38 -0700
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: "WebID XG" <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
> [snip] > > For the sake of all our inboxes, can this lengthy discussion be turned > into discussion of proposed text for a WebID specification? > > For example, who can live with: > > "A WebID is a URI (IRI, technically). Although the basic operation of > the protocol is applicable to any URI scheme for which there is some > practical notion of 'de-reference'[1], initial implementors have found > most interoperability through using the common http and https > schemes." > I agree with Dan. We should at least be able to derive an acceptable description out of this debate. I'm basically satisfied with the above text for the time being. BTW, I misrepresented myself in all this back and forth. In my previous email, I stated that: > I was the co-founder of a 150-person consulting firm. Not true. I was the co-founder of a regional database consultancy later joining a 150-person consulting firm as Director and Partner. I apologize for the error. Jeff
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:22:04 UTC