W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-webid@w3.org > April 2011

Re: SSUE-55 URL Schema Agnosticism - Danbri's proposal

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 23:01:39 +0200
Message-Id: <2CBE5094-4080-4A2B-AC9A-EFC3411847BF@bblfish.net>
To: WebID Incubator Group WG <public-xg-webid@w3.org>
Just reposting this here because some people may have just switched off from the "self-signed" thread by now, and this is a worthwhile proposal for everyone to look at, consider or improve upon.

On 19 Apr 2011, at 22:46, Dan Brickley wrote:

> [snip]
> 
> For the sake of all our inboxes, can this lengthy discussion be turned
> into discussion of proposed text for a WebID specification?
> 
> For example, who can live with:
> 
> "A WebID is a URI (IRI, technically). Although the basic operation of
> the protocol is applicable to any URI scheme for which there is some
> practical notion of 'de-reference'[1], initial implementors have found
> most interoperability through using the common http and https
> schemes."
> 
> I don't particular care for this text. But I care to see people
> arguing productively, and that's more likely when we keep our eyes on
> the prize...
> 
> I suggest an analogy with HTML's <img> tag; somehow the market settles
> on conventions for what to point to, without the spec having to
> dictate particular versions of particular allowed formats.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan
> 
> issue: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/55
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#dereference-uri
Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2011 21:02:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:06:24 UTC