W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-ssn@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Sanity check on the SSN Ontology

From: Krzysztof Janowicz <jano@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:07:02 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD890A6.3060608@psu.edu>
To: Michael Compton <Michael.Compton@csiro.au>, Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>, "public-xg-ssn@w3.org" <public-xg-ssn@w3.org>
and the pattern as such, i.e., the skeleton, can be expressed in OWL2 EL.

Krzysztof

On 11/08/2010 06:51 PM, Michael Compton wrote:
> Protege reports the language required for the sensor ontology (with 
> DUL) as SRIQ(D).
>
> For the sensor ontology alone (i.e. no DUL), I don't think we use the 
> qualified number restrictions or the datatypes, so it's a simpler 
> logic; however, you would want to use those things in any example 
> using the ontology.  Nominals are also pretty useful.  So most things 
> that use the ontology would end up using SROIQ(D) - the WM30 example I 
> did for the wiki does.
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> On 08/11/2010, at 11:34 , Alexandre Passant wrote:
>
>>
>> On 8 Nov 2010, at 07:43, Michael Compton wrote:
>>
>>> Nice work.  Good to see that we can (almost) pass these various 
>>> validation tools.
>>>
>>> I think we should we add links in the report (say in the intro or 
>>> conclusion of either the whole report or the ontology section) for 
>>> these
>>
>> Good idea. And since the first one is Linked-Data oriented, that's 
>> also a good way to outreach the ontology to the LOD community.
>>
>>> and indicate how the ontology passes through pellet lint.
>>
>> As a matter of interest, what's its OWL sub-language / dialect ?
>>
>> Alex.
>>
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/11/2010, at 9:11 , Alexandre Passant wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I've made a few sanity tests to check the current SSN ontology
>>>>
>>>> * Compliance with the LOD principles, using Vapour [1]
>>>>
>>>> Some tests fail here.
>>>>
>>>> http://validator.linkeddata.org/vapour?vocabUri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.oclc.org%2FNET%2Fssnx%2Fssn&classUri=http%3A%2F%2F&propertyUri=http%3A%2F%2F&instanceUri=http%3A%2F%2F&defaultResponse=dontmind&userAgent=vapour.sourceforge.net 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - 1st request while dereferencing resource URI without specifying 
>>>> the desired content type (HTTP response code should be 303 
>>>> (redirect)):Failed
>>>> => AFAIK, purl allows to specify a 303 rather than a 302 when 
>>>> redirecting, so that should be easy to fix
>>>>
>>>> - 2nd request while dereferencing resource URI without specifying 
>>>> the desired content type (Content type should be 
>>>> 'application/rdf+xml'):Failed
>>>> => That can be fixed on the /2005/Incubator/ssn/wiki/images/3/36/ 
>>>> folder with a .htaccess file, containing
>>>>
>>>> AddType application/rdf+xml .xml
>>>>
>>>> * Semantic / syntactic validation, using Sindice inspector [2]
>>>>
>>>> 100% OK
>>>>
>>>> http://inspector.sindice.com/inspect?url=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.oclc.org%2FNET%2Fssnx%2Fssn&content=&doTriplesValidation=1&doSyntaxValidation=1 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hope that helps,
>>>>
>>>> Alex.
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://validator.linkeddata.org/
>>>> [2] http://inspector.sindice.com/
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Dr. Alexandre Passant
>>>> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>>>> National University of Ireland, Galway
>>>> :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Dr. Alexandre Passant
>> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
>> National University of Ireland, Galway
>> :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Krzysztof Janowicz

GeoVISTA Center, Department of Geography, 302 Walker Building
Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

Email: jano@psu.edu
Webpage: http://www.personal.psu.edu/kuj13/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 00:07:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 9 November 2010 00:07:41 GMT