W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-socialweb@w3.org > May 2009

Re: Clarity in agendas

From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 23:28:49 +0200
Message-ID: <b3be92a00905211428r2b5057c0rb95548fc5a899c3d@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Cc: public-xg-socialweb@w3.org

  Thanks for the keen eyes (sorry, that agenda was made in haste as I
was preparing for my Ph.D defense last week!). The time/date has been
fixed (now with an added "Z" at the end to make sure we all know it's
UTC) and the correct #swxg IRC channel given), as well as a link to
permatime. I'll try to keep the date on permatime updated for future
telecons to prevent this in the future.


On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk> wrote:
> I don't wish to be overly critical, but the agenda put out before
> today's conference call had a couple of clarity issues.
> The datetime is listed as "2009-05-20T14:00-160-". Assuming that last
> dash is supposed to be a 0, and assuming that UTC is the intended
> timezone, that's a two hour meeting starting at 2 pm UTC. In fact, we
> had a one hour meeting starting at 1 pm UTC. I was lucky in that I
> checked in #swxg ahead of time, and in fact a good number of people seem
> to have turned up at the intended time, but it looks like Hao Wang
> doesn't possess our mind-reading skills, and there may well have been
> more people who missed out on this.
> Permatime.com is a pretty good way of removing any doubt about a
> datetime. e.g.
> http://permatime.com/UTC/2009-05-27/13:00/Next_teleconference
> Alternatively, Ian Davis provides nice RDF-enabled datetime URIs:
> http://placetime.com/interval/gregorian/2009-05-27T13:00:00Z/PT1H
> The other issue, more minor, is that the IRC channel was listed as #sxwg
> instead of #swxg - this was also on the 2009-05-13 agenda.
> --
> Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
Received on Thursday, 21 May 2009 21:29:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:07 UTC