While we are at technical discussions here... in view of the potential 'market' of vCard, I wonder whether abiding to OWL 2 RL is not even more important than OWL DL in general: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Profiles#OWL_2_RL by doing this we could ensure that relatively simple tools can also handle vCard (while still being DL). Probably somebody should also look at the somewhat changed annotation facilities of OWL 2 to see if dc:title can still be considered as annotation... Ivan Dan Brickley wrote: > On 1/6/09 22:04, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote: >> Addendum: >> >> According to >> >> http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator >> >> the current 2006 spec at >> >> http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns.rdf >> >> is not OWL DL but OWL Full. >> >> Immediate suggestions from my side (imcomplete and not 100% sure, but >> first steps): >> >> - define dc:title etc. as annotation properties before using them > > This is a little controversial, in that dc:title is *not* an annotation > property. Not clear what the emergent SW etiquette is here... > > Dan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:30 GMT