A logical byproduct of current technological and political trends, I guess: http://www.strategicsocial.com/ I was wondering was the XG thought of: a) the sheer existence of such endeavors (namely, attempts to “leverage the social web for national security”) and b) their potential for “success” or major failure. The latter could easily come from an utter rejection by the online communities or the simple fact that there's probably too much noise in the social web to make it a worthwhile source of data, etc. I really see both of those outcomes with roughly equal chances of happening. Cheers, Tim - - - - - - - Tim Anglade | director, “Turbulences” dpt. | af83 42, boulevard de Sébastopol | 75003 Paris | France 1436, Howard St | San Francisco | CA 94103 | USA Tel : +33 1 42 72 33 32 Mob : +33 6 35 92 77 58 Skype : timanglade Web : www.af83.com This email is: [ ] bloggable [ ] ask first [X] privateReceived on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 12:54:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 July 2009 12:54:40 GMT