W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org > January 2009

Re: Deliverables from the RDB2RDF XG

From: Mauro Nunez <mauro@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:35:10 -0500
To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
Message-Id: <74FD24FF-12C0-4296-86BB-B263B3F47721@w3.org>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-xg-rdb2rdf <public-xg-rdb2rdf@w3.org>

Dear Ashok,

Yes, it's ok to provide PDF as an alternative to an xhtml version.


On Jan 23, 2009, at 11:25 AM, ashok malhotra wrote:

> Ivan, Mauro:
> As you know, the RDB2RDF XG is coming to a close.  We are planning  
> two deliverables and I thought I would run them by you for early  
> comments.
> 1. We have prepared a final report.  This is attached.  I am trying  
> to get permission to put it on the W3C site.
> 2. We have prepared a State Of the Art Survey.  This is in the form  
> of extensions to the ESW  Wiki http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/StateOfTheArt 
>  or as a PDF file http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/StateOfTheArt?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=RDB2RDF_SurveyReport.pdf 
>  <http://esw.w3.org/topic/Rdb2RdfXG/StateOfTheArt?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=RDB2RDF_SurveyReport.pdf 
> >. both have the same content.  Is this format acceptable for an XG  
> deliverable?
> -- 
> All the best, Ashok
Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 18:35:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:51:39 UTC