Re: Provenance Vocabulary Mapping encoding

Satya,

I spent some time with the mappings table and wrote up a little about it at 

http://inference-web.org/wiki/PML_2.1_-_a_Layered_Approach#RDF_encoding_of_prov-xg.27s_provenance_vocabulary_mappings

I'd be happy to address any questions or comments.

Regards,
Tim Lebo


On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:21 AM, Satya Sahoo wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> Currently, the mappings are table entries on the Wiki. 
> 
> 
> We have some of the mappings in an OWL file, but we are trying to address two issues:
> 1. Encoding some of the provenance terminologies in OWL is not straightforward
> 2. Some of mappings involve multiple steps (currently encoded using skos:relatedMatch), which cannot be expressed as OWL axioms (I am trying to use rules as an alternative)
> 
> 
> We hope to post the OWL file on the Wiki in future.
> 
> 
> Best,
> Satya  
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Groth <pgroth@gmail.com>
> Date: Thursday, January 13, 2011 4:08 am
> Subject: Re: Provenance Vocabulary Mapping encoding
> To: Timothy Lebo <lebot@rpi.edu>
> Cc: public-xg-prov@w3.org
> 
> > Hi Tim,
> > 
> > We use the skos terms in the mappings on the wiki. I think Satya 
> > may 
> > have those in an actual file. Satya?
> > 
> > cheers,
> > Paul
> > 
> > Timothy Lebo wrote:
> > > prov-xg,
> > >
> > > Both the Provenance XG Final Report [1] and Provenance 
> > Vocabulary Mappings [2] state:
> > >
> > > "The mappings between the provenance terms are formally 
> > encoded using the W3C recommended Simple Knowledge Organization 
> > System (SKOS) vocabulary."
> > >
> > > However, I haven't been able to locate an encoding. Is there a 
> > link to an RDF file, or is the formal encoding simply the 
> > mention within the wiki cell?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Tim Lebo
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/XGR-prov-20101214/
> > > [2] 
> > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Provenance_Vocabulary_Mappings>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >

Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 00:45:40 UTC