W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-prov@w3.org > November 2010

Re: W3C Provenance Working Group Charter - alternate version for discussion

From: Yolanda Gil <gil@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:36:49 -0800
Cc: Satya Sahoo <sahoo.2@wright.edu>, "<public-xg-prov@w3.org>" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Message-Id: <38FF5A54-D584-4848-8B67-DA5CAE72D413@isi.edu>
To: Luc Moreau <L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Luc:

That's right, but we did agree to the term "resource" in our  
definition of provenance [1].  We should be more clear about this,  
both in the definition and in the charter.

Yolanda



Yolanda Gil, USC/ISI
+1-310-448-8794





On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Luc Moreau wrote:

> Yolanda,
>
> Resources on the Web can be stateful whereas artifacts (in OPM) are  
> stateless.
> It would not be appropriate to replace artifact by resource.
>
> Simon's mapping of DC to OPM offers a nice mechanism to relate a  
> stateful resource
> to its states/versions, i.e. artifacts.
>
> Luc
>
> On 17/11/10 15:53, Yolanda Gil wrote:
>> Though I think we have already discussed referring to "resource"  
>> rather than artifact
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 17:38:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:00 UTC