W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-prov@w3.org > June 2010

Re: Report on the requirement presentation at the RDF Next Step Workshop

From: Paolo Missier <pmissier@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:56:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4C29B55B.9030403@acm.org>
To: Jun Zhao <jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk>
CC: "public-xg-prov@w3.org" <public-xg-prov@w3.org>
Hi Jun
thank you for representing the group and for reporting!
just to make sure: should I assume that the group was not concerned with 
SPARQL at all, and with closure operator extensions to SPARQL in particular?

Cheers, -Paolo


Jun Zhao wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> My slides can be found at [1]. The source file is available upon 
> request but it's only in Open Office format.
>
> The audiences are generally interested in our requirements. However, 
> not unexpectedly, not all of them fell within the scope of RDF core. 
> But our requirements did have big impact on putting Named Graphs and 
> mechanism for naming RDF graphs high in the agenda in the group 
> discussions.
>
> Some draft charters came out of the workshop, which can be found at 
> [2]. This will be sent out to the swig list very soon. Some kind of 
> working groups might be chartered late this year or early next year.
>
> There were a lot of tweets under the channel of #rdfn. The IRC logs 
> can also be found at [3, 4, 5]
>
> I am happy to give more updates in the next week's telecom.
>
> [1] http://www.slideshare.net/junzhao/2010-06-rdfnext
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/RDF_Core_Charter_2010#Graph_Metadata
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/26-rdfn-irc
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/27-rdfn-irc
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2010/06/27-rdfn-meta-minutes.html
>
> cheers,
>
> Jun
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 09:34:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 June 2010 09:34:58 GMT