Re: where does access time belong in the provenance dimension? from Olaf Hartig on 2009-12-07 (public-xg-prov@w3.org from December 2009)

From: Olaf Hartig <hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 13:13:38 +0100
To: public-xg-prov@w3.org
Message-Id: <200912071313.41484.hartig@informatik.hu-berlin.de>

Hey,

On Monday 07 December 2009 13:07:21 Paul Groth wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I would agree with the definition of "provenance as the process that
> yielded an artifact". We've (PASOA project) used a similar definition in
> the past: "the provenance of a result is the process that led to that
> result".
> 
> I agree that retrieval is overloaded. So why don't we stick with Data
> Access under Process?
> 
> What do you think?

I'm fine with it.

If none objects I will adjust the Provenance Dimensions page in our wiki 
accordingly.

Olaf

Received on Monday, 7 December 2009 12:14:27 UTC