W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-mmsem@w3.org > July 2007

RE: [MMSEM-Vocabulary] comments on XGR

From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:26:31 +0200
Message-ID: <768DACDC356ED04EA1F1130F97D2985201211DAC@RZJC2EX.jr1.local>
To: "Troncy, Raphael" <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: "MMSem-XG Public List" <public-xg-mmsem@w3.org>


RaphaŽl,

Thanks for the review. I will certainly address your
issues  - hope to get it done by tomorrow.

Cheers,
	Michael

----------------------------------------------------------
 Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
 Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
 JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
 Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
---------------------------------------------------------- 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RaphaŽl Troncy [mailto:Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl] 
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 6:07 PM
> To: Hausenblas, Michael
> Cc: MMSem-XG Public List
> Subject: [MMSEM-Vocabulary] comments on XGR
> 
> Dear Michael,
> 
> Apologies for this long delay. This is finally my internal 
> review for the "Multimedia Vocabularies on the Semantic Web" 
> document [1]. Once these comments addressed, the document 
> would be published as an XGR very soon.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-vocabularies/
> Revision: ??
> 
> Header:
>     - I have sorted alphabetically the contributors and moved 
> Roberto and Werner in the ack section since they were not 
> members of the XG.
>     - They were no consistency on the links from the names 
> (email, homepage, institution page). The preferred link is 
> the homepage. For Michael and Erik, there is now a link to 
> your email address. Would you both prefer to link your name 
> to a web page?
> 
> Section 3.1.1: put a reference for VRA and for Dublin Core 
> the first time the reader encounters these terms.
> Section 3.1.2: put a reference to EXIF.
> Section 3.1.3: say first what is NISO Z39.87 and put a 
> reference so that the description is homogeneous to the other 
> sections. Currently, the section begins with "Tags cover a 
> wide ..." => what are you talking about? What is the 
> dictionary you're refering to?
> Section 3.1.4: put a reference to DIG35
> Section 3.1.5: put a reference to PhotoRDF Section 3.2.1: put 
> a reference to ID3 In this section, you wrote: "The ID3 
> specification tries to cover a broad range; a list of genres 
> is defined.". Could you precise what is this "broad range"? 
> Could you give this list of genre defined by ID3 tags? Would 
> it make sense to enumerate the 15 most used properties in
> ID3 and explicitely write that the user can define his own properties?
> Section 3.2.2: put a reference to MusicBrainz Section 3.2.3: 
> put a reference to MusicXML Section 3.3.1: given that the 
> MPEG-7 document will remain a very preliminary draft, I 
> suggest you include ALL
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/wiki/Vocabularies#e_MPE
> G-7 in the section 3.3.1. You can end this section with the 
> pointer towards the MMSem XF working draft 
> (http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-mpeg7/). Don't 
> forget the reference to MPEG-7.
> Section 3.3.2: put a reference to AAF
> Section 3.3.3: put a reference to MXF
> Section 3.4.1: put a reference to SMIL. Could you also say a 
> word about SMIL 3.0 which is just announced as the last Call 
> for Comments for a WD before becoming a Candidate Recommendation ...
> Section 3.4.2: put a reference to SVG
> Section 3.5.1: put a reference to NewsML Section 3.5.2: put a 
> reference to TVAnytime Section 3.5.3: put a reference to 
> MPEG-21 The description of this standard is far too long, and 
> not consistent with the other ones :-( There is no usefulness 
> to describe the 18 parts, or we should have done the same 
> thing for MPEG-7 for example. I think the description of all 
> parts could be completely removed. An alternative (my 
> preference) would be to report only about the relevant parts 
> for the topics covered by the XG, that is: the parts 2 and 3 
> (Digital Item) and the part 17 (fragment identification).
> Section 3.5.4: put a reference to EBU P/Meta Section 3.6.1: 
> put a reference to Dublin Core Section 4.3: given that the 
> MPEG-7 document will remain a very preliminary draft, I 
> suggest you include ALL
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/wiki/Vocabularies#f_MPE
> G-7 in the section 4.3. You can end this section with the 
> pointer towards the MMSem XF working draft 
> (http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-mpeg7/).
> Section 5: given that VDO is also part of MPEG-7, would it 
> make sense to have a dedicated section 5 or should you merge 
> sections 4 and 5 into a single section "Multimedia 
> Ontologies" and including VRA, EXIF, MPEG-7, NewsML, VDO, 
> etc. in OWL/RDF?
> The section 5.3 is incomplete. Could you complete them?
> 
> References: are you using all of them?
> 
> * "Put a reference to ..." means having the standard listed 
> in the Reference section and the relevant pointer to that in 
> the appropriate section.
> 
> I have also corrected some typos found all along the document ("viz."
> which is rarely used in English, "..." found at different 
> places, etc.) and rephrased some sections. Please, could you 
> tell me if you agree with all the changes?
> 
> Best regards.
> 
>     RaphaŽl
> 
> ---------------------------------
> 
> --
> RaphaŽl Troncy
> CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Kruislaan 
> 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
> Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
> Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 16 July 2007 19:26:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:22 GMT