Dear Michael, Thank you very much for taking this work ! [4] is an excellent start ! Do not hesitate to take all the content of [2], and paste it in the wiki page. It is important that for each existing ontology, a brief description as well as the link towards the ontology is present. With respect to your questions: > a) Whoever has write access to [2], please change the link in the "status" section to point to [4], and Done, see: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/resources/Vocabularies.html > b) Put the vocabulary issue onto the agenda for the upcoming telecon on 12 Oct. It will be an agenda item. Raphaël [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/MM/resources/Vocabularies.html [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/wiki/Vocabularies -- Raphaël Troncy CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science), Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093 Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312 Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 09:17:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:20 GMT