W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-mmsem@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Agenda for 7 Dec meeting and call for contributions

From: <ovidio.salvetti@isti.cnr.it>
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 08:33:30 +0000
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>, Hobson Paola-BPH001 <Paola.Hobson@motorola.com>
Cc: "multimedia-ontology@iti.gr" <multimedia-ontology@iti.gr>, MMSem-XG Public List <public-xg-mmsem@w3.org>, Richard Arndt <rarndt@uni-koblenz.de>
Message-id: <WaN0mGg0.1162974810.7310300.osalvetti@popstore.iat.cnr.it>

Dear Raphael,
I am currently attending a conference and it is not possible for me to
participate the meeting.
My apologies.

In data 7/11/2006, "RaphaŽl Troncy" <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl> ha scritto:

>Dear Paola,
>With respect to the current agenda, I would be happy to give some
>updates of the XG during the meeting (item 3), but you cannot expect to
>have any useful content in 5 minutes :-( I could only do advertisement
>in 5 minutes :-)
>If it is relevant, I would need at least 10 minutes to explain what kind
>of interoperability problems we try to address and the usefullness of a
>common multimedia ontology framework. I understand that item 5 is the
>most important one in the agenda. See below.
>> Please could you send any contributions for the Proposals – Ideas for
>> Common Framework agenda item (item 5) to the list in advance of the
>> meeting so that we can collate the ideas and focus the discussion.
>You probably know that K-Space is developping a general multimedia
>ontology, based on MPEG-7, but following a real re-engineering and
>formalization process. The result is a nice modular top level ontology,
>easily extendable. I would suggest that Richard Arndt from Koblenz
>University (the main architect of this ontology) and me present it
>during this time slot.
>For preparing the following discussion, it would be interesting to
>constitute small groups of people (based on the contributors for the
>requirements document) that volunteer to take back the requirements they
>have expressed, and decide to work on this ontology (or another one) and
>see if it now allows to fullfill their requirements, and if not, express
>what is missing and what should be added, changed, etc. We could simply
>start from the requirement lists nicely summarized in
>and examine them one per one by small task force groups.
>Best regards.
>    RaphaŽl
>RaphaŽl Troncy
>CWI (Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science),
>Kruislaan 413, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
>e-mail: raphael.troncy@cwi.nl & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
>Tel: +31 (0)20 - 592 4093
>Fax: +31 (0)20 - 592 4312
>Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2006 08:34:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:01:24 UTC