>> ACTION: ALL give comments on the "Image annotation on the Semantic >> Web" Working Draft [recorded in >> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/10-mmsem-minutes.html#action07] >> Another comment about the OWL representations in the working draft Section 1.2 i rewrite here all the example of the BigImage OWL class <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#" xmlns="http://example.org/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xml:base="http://example.org/" > <owl:Class rdf:about="BigImage"> <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> <owl:Class rdf:about="#Image" /> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="#hasSize" /> <owl:cardinality rdf:datatype="xsd:nonNegativeInteger">1</owl:cardinality> <owl:allValueFrom rdf:resource="#Big" /> </owl:Restriction> </owl:intersectionOf> </owl:Class> </rdf:RDF> MassimoReceived on Thursday, 20 July 2006 11:43:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:19 GMT