W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: questions from the Vocabulary and Dataset editing.

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:37:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4E7AE5C8.1040006@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
That seems alright, Jodi!
I can also live with some stuff not being spelled out, really :-)

Thanks,

Antoine


>
> On 15 Sep 2011, at 17:21, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>
>> Ok, trying it...
>>
>>
>>> * I'm not sure what this means:
>>> "Although ULAN not yet published as Linked Data per se, it does appears in the [http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#VIAF_.28Virtual_International_Authority_File.29|VIAF]."
>>
>>
>> ULAN data has been included in VIAF. So ULAN available via VIAF, in a way...
>
> I modified this to
> "Although ULAN not yet published as Linked Data per se, it is included in the VIAF <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#VIAF_.28Virtual_International_Authority_File.29> as the Getty Research Institute's contribution."
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6560&oldid=6559 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6560&oldid=6559>
>
> Feel free to fix that!
>
>>
>>
>>> * What does "their own" refer to here?
>>> "In addition to the documentation made available on their own websites, the reader can view their content using generic ontology creation and visualization tools such as [http://protege.stanford.edu/ Protégé], the [http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/browser/ Manchester ontology browser], [http://pellet.owldl.com/owlsight/ OWL Sight] or the [http://lode.sourceforge.net/ Live OWL Documentation Environment (LODE)]"
>>
>>
>> "the websites of these vocabularies"
>
> Ah.
>
> How about this?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6559&oldid=6557 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6559&oldid=6557>
>
> In addition to the documentation provided by its maintainers, an ontology can also be viewed using generic ontology creation and visualization tools such as Protégé <http://protege.stanford.edu/>, the Manchester ontology browser <http://owl.cs.manchester.ac.uk/browser/>, OWL Sight <http://pellet.owldl.com/owlsight/> or the Live OWL Documentation Environment (LODE) <http://lode.sourceforge.net/> (see for example the Description of a Project (DOAP) ontology rendered in LODE <http://lode.sourceforge.net/http://usefulinc.com/ns/doap>).
>
>>
>>
>>> ACRONYMS
>>> * Does NACO stand for "name authority component"? Should we spell that out?
>
> Ok--so Name Authority Component (NACO) Authority File? Or is that redundant?
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6561&oldid=6560 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6561&oldid=6560>
>
>>> * Does TELplus stand for The European Library plus?
>>
>>
>> Yes
>>
>>> Should we spell that out?
>>
>>
>> I don't know. It reads really weird spelled out.
>
> Ok, I'll leave TELplus. :)
>
>>
>>
>>> * What is the correct name for MARC21? MAchine-Readable Cataloging21?
>>> * When should DC be abbreviated?
>>> * Should API be spelled out?
>
> Still looking for opinions on these three
>
>
>>> * Does SKOS-XL have a long name?
>>
>>
>> No (unless you spell out SKOS, but then it will look ugly)
>
> I followed Marcia's suggestion.
>>
>>
>>> * Ditto for OWL-DL?
>>
>>
>> Ditto
>
> Hmm-- since we spelled out SKOS-XL, maybe OWL-Description Logic (OWL-DL)?
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6564&oldid=6563 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6564&oldid=6563>
>
>>
>>
>>> * Does LOCAH have a long name?
>>> * Does SPECTRUM have a long name?
>
> Still waiting for opinions on these two. :)
>
>>>
>>> STRUCTURAL STUFF
>>> * "As of the winter of 2011," "It contains terms in 24 languages (as of May 2011)."
>>> Do we want to say "As of the date of this report"?
>>
>>
>> Yes.
>
> Ok -- fixed in two places:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6563&oldid=6561 <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6563&oldid=6561>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> * It's a little strange that the usage examples appear before the vocabs here:
>>
>>
>> could not find a better way...
>
> I don't think it needs to be changed, just struck me at the time. :)
>
>>
>>>
>>> =====Preservation vocabularies from LoC=====
>>>
>>> * Usage examples: [[Use Case Digital Preservation]]
>>>
>>> ======[http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservationEvents Preservation Events]======
>>>
>>> A concept scheme for the preservation events, i.e., actions performed on digital objects within a preservation repository.
>>>
>>> ======[http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/preservationLevelRole Preservation Level Role]======
>>>
>>> A concept scheme for the preservation level roles, i.e., values that specify in what context a set of preservation options is applicable.
>>>
>
> -Jodi
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2011 07:35:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 22 September 2011 07:35:37 GMT