W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Links to "use cases" from "available data"

From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 19:08:38 +0100
Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Message-Id: <0CC33792-0283-4CF1-B344-0B74E043AB71@deri.org>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@FEW.VU.NL>

On 15 Sep 2011, at 22:33, Antoine Isaac wrote:

> Hmmm, yes, that's a good point. I think we should let the editor decide!
> I think whatever be Daniel's decision, no-one would object to him cleaning the titles of the wiki pages as well. If this can be done, which I have some doubts about.

Cleaning the titles *should* be as simple as moving the pages. We do seem to have access to do that.

-Jodi

> 
> But as you understood, I'm not going to push this very strongly...
> 
> Antoine
> 
> 
>> I noticed the Use Case up/low problem, but it seemed that the names of the cases on this page were in the same case as they were on the pages for the cases. (Sorry for so many "cases.") We decided on sentence case for our sub-headings, but these are the names of documents. If we change them to sentence case in the use case report, should we also change them to sentence case in the wiki pages for each use case?
>> 
>> kc
>> 
>> Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> As per our call today, I have tried to clean the "usage examples" of the Datasets, Value Vocabularies, and Metadata Element Sets deliverable:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Vocabulary_and_Dataset&diff=6547&oldid=6537
>>> 
>>> But I'm not so confident I'm finished: in the process, I have spotted that there are many capitalization issues in the headings of the use case report, see
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport#Summary_of_individual_cases
>>> 
>>> Should one decide this is not good, we'd have to adapt the work I've done to new headings. Now the question is, does anyone want to change the capitalization in the Use case report?
>>> 
>>> Antoine
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 16 September 2011 18:09:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 September 2011 18:09:19 GMT