W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Executive Summary--italics to stress who each recommendation is directed at?

From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:46:49 -0400
To: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110913144648.GA12678@julius>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 07:56:29PM +0100, Jodi Schneider wrote:
> In the Executive Summary, I would propose adding bold or italics to stress the responsible parties. Here's what I mean:
> Key recommendations of the report are:
> That library leaders identify sets of data as possible candidates for early exposure as Linked Data and foster a discussion about Open Data and rights;
> That library standards bodies increase library participation in Semantic Web standardization, develop library data standards that are compatible with Linked Data, and disseminate best-practice design patterns tailored to library Linked Data;
> That data and systems designers design enhanced user services based on Linked Data capabilities, create URIs for the items in library datasets, develop policies for managing RDF vocabularies and their URIs, and express library data by re-using or mapping to existing Linked Data vocabularies;
> That librarians and archivists preserve Linked Data element sets and value vocabularies and apply library experience in curation and long-term preservation to Linked Data datasets.

Adding italics or boldface to emphasize the responsible parties is fine with me!


Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 14:47:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:59 UTC