W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Appendix A: stressing the definitions

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:18:07 +0200
Message-ID: <4E6B638F.1030207@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Makes sense. Done!


> Similarly to my proposal for the Executive Summary, I would like to see bold formatting used on the terms being defined in Appendix A.
> -Jodi
> Though Linked Data technology differs from traditional library data concepts, this report classifies available resources into three non-mutually-exclusive categories that reflect library practices:
>     * *Datasets* <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#Published_Datasets> describing library-related resources, e.g., the British National Bibliography, the catalogue of the Hungarian national library, the Open Library, CrossRef, Europeana;
>     * *Value vocabularies* <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#Published_value_vocabularies> such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, AGROVOC, the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF), Dewey Decimal Classification, and GeoNames;
>     * *Metadata element sets* <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset#Metadata_Element_Sets> such as Dublin Core Metadata Terms, the elements of Resource Description and Access (RDA), Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS), and the Friend of a Friend vocabulary (FOAF).
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 13:15:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:59 UTC