W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: "particular uniquely identified resource"

From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:35:31 -0400
To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Message-ID: <20110910013531.GA12341@julius>
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 11:44:46AM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
> I don't think a comma is required there.

+1 - and as for the hyphen, according to Chicago Manual of Style:
    
    Type: adverb ending in -ly + participle or adject.  Always open.
    (Examples: highly developed species, poorly seen, barely living, wholly
    invented...)

Tom

> kc
> 
> Quoting Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>:
> 
> >I think the phrase "particular uniquely identified resource" might
> >need a comma or hyphen, in order to ensure it's correctly parsed.
> >Thoughts?
> >
> >In a graph-based architecture, in contrast, an organization can
> >supply individual statements about a resource, and all statements
> >provided about a particular uniquely identified resource can be
> >aggregated into a global graph.
> >
> >Some possibilities:
> >"particular, uniquely identified resource"
> >"particular uniquely-identified resource"
> >"particular, uniquely-identified resource"
> >
> >I'm not sure if any of these are clear/prevent misreading.
> >Hopefully somebody else has a sense of that (or will just tell me
> >to be less picky!)
> >
> >-Jodi
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
> 

-- 
Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 01:36:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 10 September 2011 01:36:19 GMT