W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:49:45 -0700
Message-ID: <20110909114945.11305bzzhw1eyeh5@kcoyle.net>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Quoting Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>:


> ...or indeed, whether the advocates of IRIs advocate their use in libraries
> regardless of scripts used -- i.e., even for Latin-script URIs?  Bottom line:
> since this report is about Linked Data, and the Linked Data message always
> talks about URIs (or even URLs), I think we need to stick with URIs.

+1
kc


>
> Would you like to propose a text?
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 18:50:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 September 2011 18:50:22 GMT