W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?

From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 19:15:03 +0100
Cc: "public-xg-lld" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Message-Id: <9A869B3E-8E28-4BAD-84AB-F655930956E3@deri.org>
To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
Thanks, Jeff!

I changed the affiliation in the Executive Summary (but didn't check affiliation statements for the side deliverables)
as well as in the list of institutions I'd mentioned:


On 9 Sep 2011, at 19:10, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:

> Jodi,
> Oddly enough, our legal name may resolve this situation:
> OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.
> Itís enough to make you wonder why our acronym isnít OOCLC. :-)
> Jeff
> From: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jodi Schneider
> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 2:02 PM
> To: public-xg-lld
> Subject: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?
> In the Scope section, do we want to follow the capitalization we've had throughout ("library Linked Data") or use what's there now "Library Linked Data"?
> Library Linked Data. "Library Linked Data" (LLD) is any type of Library Data (as defined above) that is expressed as Linked Data.
> I assume we also want to lowercase "library data" (rather than "Library Data") here?
> -Jodi
Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 18:15:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 9 September 2011 18:15:32 GMT