W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

RE: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?

From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 14:10:12 -0400
Message-ID: <52E301F960B30049ADEFBCCF1CCAEF590DB42E18@OAEXCH4SERVER.oa.oclc.org>
To: "Jodi Schneider" <jodi.schneider@deri.org>, "public-xg-lld" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>


Oddly enough, our legal name may resolve this situation:


OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc.


It's enough to make you wonder why our acronym isn't OOCLC. :-)




From: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Jodi Schneider
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 2:02 PM
To: public-xg-lld
Subject: Scope -- "library Linked Data" or "Library Linked Data"?


In the Scope section, do we want to follow the capitalization we've had
throughout ("library Linked Data") or use what's there now "Library
Linked Data"?


Library Linked Data. "Library Linked Data" (LLD) is any type of Library
Data (as defined above) that is expressed as Linked Data.

I assume we also want to lowercase "library data" (rather than "Library
Data") here?

Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 18:11:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:58 UTC