W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Terminology : libraries, library world, library community

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 09:01:00 -0700
Message-ID: <20110907090100.11013byh1wpburek@kcoyle.net>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
I prefer "community" - kc

Quoting Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>:

> I've bumped on several ocurences, in the report, of the expression
> "the library world"
> e.g.
>
> "the library world's identifiers for authority control" (scope [1])
> "vendors outside the library world may be able to adapt..." (benefits
> to developers and vendors [2])
> "Standardization in the library world..." (the current situation [3])
>
> I'm wondering if that expression is not a kind of jargon left over
> from informal discussions in the group ("in libraryworld"). Does
> everybody feel comfortable with it ? Should we use "library community"
> instead ? or just "libraries" as expected in [4] ?
>
> If I'm the only one to feel strange about "library world", we may just
> leave it as is...
>
> [1]  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion#Scope_of_this_report
> [2]  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion#Benefits_to_developers_and_vendors
> [3]  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion#Library_standards_are_designed_only_for_the_library_community
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/ConversionStyle
>
> Emma
>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:01:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 September 2011 16:01:34 GMT