W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT

From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:03:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAODLZ4gue9Y-czgFjjQj3JF5WWjqWCdMbEM6jmW0spZsxzthuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Svensson, Lars" <L.Svensson@dnb.de>
Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
It's not a good idea though to completely abandon the reference to
managers. What about "library managers and thought leaders" ? too long
?

Emma

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Svensson, Lars <L.Svensson@dnb.de> wrote:
>> I can't remember what this started out as, but both "leaders" and
>> "leadership" will probably be understood as "library directors and
>> other management types." If we want it to mean "thought leaders" or
>> "technology leaders" then we'll need those adjectives to be there. IMO.
>
> I'd support "thought leaders". Anyone can be a thought leader, even if they have no formal leadership position. To me, "leadership" does have a notion of "management position".
>
> All the best,
>
> Lars
>
>  **** Bitte beachten Sie die neue Internet- und E-Mail-Adresse. ****
>  **** Please note my new internet- and email-address. ****
>
> --
> Dr. Lars G. Svensson
> Deutsche Nationalbibliothek / Informationstechnik
> http://www.dnb.de/
> l.svensson@dnb.de
>
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org]
>> Im Auftrag von Karen Coyle
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 01:31
>> An: public-xg-lld@w3.org
>> Betreff: [Spam-Wahrscheinlichkeit=45]Re: "Design user stories and
>> models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT
>>
>> I can't remember what this started out as, but both "leaders" and
>> "leadership" will probably be understood as "library directors and
>> other management types." If we want it to mean "thought leaders" or
>> "technology leaders" then we'll need those adjectives to be there. IMO.
>>
>> kc
>>
>>
>>
>> Quoting Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>:
>>
>> > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> >> >I think of "leaders" not just as formal leaders, but as including,
>> >> for example
>> >> >"thought leaders"...
>> >>
>> >> To make that clear, it would have to be worded "thought leaders."
>> >
>> > You agree, then, that "leaders" will be read as leaders in a formal
>> > sense, and that "leadership" is better as a heading of the section
>> > "For library leadership"?
>> >
>> > Tom
>> >
>> > --
>> > Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Karen Coyle
>> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
>> ph: 1-510-540-7596
>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>> skype: kcoylenet
>>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 08:03:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 September 2011 08:03:44 GMT