W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: "Design user stories and models for user interfaces"?? - IMPORTANT

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 08:12:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4E670B69.1060900@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On 9/6/11 10:35 PM, Tom Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0200, Antoine Isaac wrote:
>>> Very good point.  Standards bodies will not design services, but library
>>> leaders can direct the services to be designed.  Besides, library leaders get
>>> off relatively easy, with just two Recommendations to follow, while standards
>>> bodies have four...  Moving this point to the Library Leadership section would
>>> balance things out -- three and three :-)
>>
>> Yes :-)
>> But on second thought, if we keep the section like it is now, its title "Design and test user services based on Linked Data capabilities" reads naturally like a documentation for "designers"!
>
> But then it should be under "For data and systems designers".  Right now, it is under "For
> standards bodies and participants"!  I do think it would fit well in "For data and systems
> designers".


Yes, done!

Antoine


>
>>> BTW, we have headings for bodies, participants, designers, librarians,
>>> archivists, and... leadership.  Shouldn't that be "For library leaders"?
>>
>> Unless there's a strong argument against, I prefer to keep it like this. "leaders" has a strong connotation to me, which is less obvious in "leadership". A bit as if "leadership" was leaving more room for people who are not formal leaders (library director, department heads) to step in and battle for moving things forwards at a higher-level. But maybe that's just me.
>
> I think of "leaders" not just as formal leaders, but as including, for example
> "thought leaders"...
>
> Tom
>
Received on Wednesday, 7 September 2011 06:10:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 7 September 2011 06:11:00 GMT