W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Recommendations -- authority files and discrete values

From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:25:29 -0400
To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
Cc: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-xg-lld@w3.org
Message-ID: <20110906022529.GA59570@julius>
Yeah - won't work...  But I share Karen's dislike of "entity".

Tom

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:56:05PM -0400, Jeff Young wrote:
> An RDF audience will read "individual" as an instance of any type. A library
> audience will possibly assume "individual" refers to an individual person.
> God help us.
> 
> Jeff
> 
> Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 05:30:43PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
> > so maybe:
> > 
> > Among these are authority files, whose members identify individual
> > entities (I don't like that term), and controlled lists of values.
> 
> Or simply: "whose members identify individuals"?  Or does that
> imply too strongly "individual people"...?
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 02:26:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 6 September 2011 02:26:12 GMT