W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Another appendix A question - "side deliverable"

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 20:14:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4E651168.8080401@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
+1 to all points here...

A.

> I wondered about that, too, but I think that this is a change that will need to be made in the HTML version, because we can then simply link to the other report, we don't need to refer to it in this way.
>
> I'm seeing a lot of areas where we'll need to make the changes in the HTML -- that is, just about everything with a reference (URL). So we should plan on some editing time for the html docs.
>
> kc
>
>
> Quoting Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>:
>
>> Somewhat tangentially, I wonder if we should continue to refer
>> to the side deliverables as "side deliverables" in the final
>> report. Should we perhaps refer to them by their (short) names?
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:05:09AM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
>>> In the paragraph about the use cases it states:
>>>
>>> Instances of these categories are listed in the side deliverable
>>> along with a brief description, links to their locations and to the
>>> [http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport use cases]
>>> that our group has gathered from the community
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what is meant here by "their locations" -- links to
>>> each use case's wiki page seems to be covered by the third thing in
>>> the sentence. Anyone?
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 18:11:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 September 2011 18:11:56 GMT