W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: "Microformats, Microdata, and RDFa" - attn: Jeff and Peter!

From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:02:54 -0400
To: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
Cc: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110905180254.GA50151@julius>
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 06:03:45PM +0100, Jodi Schneider wrote:
> > -- "Though in principle extensible, the microdata schemas would require a
> > lot of extension..."?  Was the more cryptic: "Though _it_ is in principle
> > extensible _it_ would require..."
> 
> I find the "though in principle extensible" confusing here, since it precedes
> the subject of the sentence (the microdata schemas). 
> 
> So I'd prefer something like:
> 
> Although they are, in principle, extensible, microdata schemes would need to
> be heavily extended in order to express library information since most of the
> required vocabulary is lacking.
> 
> or
> 
> Microdata schemes, while in principle extensible, would require a lot of
> extension for use in expressing library information since most of the
> required vocabulary is lacking.
> 
> or
> 
> Although in principle they are extensible, microdata schemes would need to be
> heavily extended in order to express library information since most of the
> required vocabulary is lacking.

All three are better than (though consistent with) what I proposed, especially
the third.  Will you make the change?

Tom
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 18:03:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 5 September 2011 18:03:35 GMT