W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > September 2011

Re: The acronym "RDA" in the name of JSC

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 12:16:29 -0700
Message-ID: <20110903121629.11735cpskatefll9@kcoyle.net>
To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Tom, I think that, within the context, what is in there is fine.  No  
one is going to fault us for spelling it out. Let's leave it -- it  
conveys the message, which is the most important thing.

kc


Quoting Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>:

> On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 05:39:58PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> >On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:34:07PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
>> >>It calls itself "Joint Steering Committee for the Development of
>> >>RDA," so the acronym appears in the name as an acronym. I think we
>> >>should use it in the way the JSC does.
>> >
>> >Yeah, that's what I was sort of thinking too.  But where would we
>> >expand "RDA", or do we really need to?
>>
>> Perhaps we should organize it so we mention RDA first, expanded and
>> with acronym, before we mention JSC. What section are you in?
>
> The first reference to RDA I see is [1].  For the overall context, see
> [2].
>
> Tom
>
> [1]  
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page_take2#Library_standards_are_designed_only_for_the_library_community
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion
>
>



-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Saturday, 3 September 2011 19:16:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 3 September 2011 19:17:00 GMT