W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Medline RDF -- Citations

From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 18:56:14 +0200
To: Ben O'Steen <bosteen@gmail.com>
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286@cam.ac.uk>, david.shotton@zoo.ox.ac.uk, mark@odaesa.com
Message-ID: <20110508165614.GJ31006@styx.org>
* [2011-05-08 11:39:38 +0100] Ben O'Steen <bosteen@gmail.com> écrit:

] Just a quick note to say that the agreement we got for the data was in
] context of basic bibliographic information (as specified by the open
] bibliographic principles) - getting an agreement that we can share the
] citation information as well as cc0 is an ongoing conversation
] unfortunately.

Right, so that relieves some urgency at least...

And what about the information about what chemicals and datasets were
used? Is that another kind of citation from a bibliographic point of
view? Anyhow, right now there's a command line flag for the program,
-0=false, to turn off CC0 only data so if you already have the data
you can make RDF out of some of the other bits, but I don't plan on
working on that much in the near term -- what we have now is a stellar
start).

For the LLD list, here's some explanation of technical details together
an annotated example record:

    http://eris.okfn.org/ww/2011/05/medline

Cheers,
-w
-- 
William Waites                <mailto:ww@styx.org>
http://river.styx.org/ww/        <sip:ww@styx.org>
F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB  3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Sunday, 8 May 2011 16:56:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 8 May 2011 16:56:38 GMT