W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > March 2011

Re: Tools and final deliverable

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:09:57 +0100
Message-ID: <4D77A655.4020601@few.vu.nl>
To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
CC: "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On 3/9/11 3:45 PM, Karen Coyle wrote:
> Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:
>
>
>>
>> The suggestion was to re-frame it into producing a section on "relevant technology" for the report--or a side deliverable if the owners feel like reporting on many things. Would that make sense to the action owners?
>
> Or a bit of both? We should probably mention relevant technology in the report, but a longer investigation could be a side report on the wiki.



Yes, sure!

Antoine


>
>>
>> We were also thinking of asking Kevin and Kim to jump in, because they do have quite some experience with tooling as well.
>> Ed would be an ideal victim, but he's already formally involved in other sections ;-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2011/03/03-lld-minutes.html
>>
>>
>>> We talked this morning about what tools are available for LLD. I think Jeff volunteered to write something up. :-) I think this will make a difference for the issues section, so I'd like to encourage folks to contribute in this area if they know of LLD tools (or LD tools that can be applied to LLD). (Maybe we need a section or wiki page for this.)
>>>
>>> I'd also like for us to make clear what are developer tools and what are "user" tools (e.g. for catalogers or others who want to create data). I usually get asked about the latter because that's who is in my audience in most cases. However, both are useful (and there may be other categories -- these are the two that come to mind).
>>>
>>> kc
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 16:09:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 March 2011 16:09:21 GMT