W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > March 2011

RE: Tools

From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 09:31:52 -0500
Message-ID: <52E301F960B30049ADEFBCCF1CCAEF590BB01F80@OAEXCH4SERVER.oa.oclc.org>
To: "Ed Summers" <ehs@pobox.com>
Cc: "Karen Coyle" <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
I'm not aware of any library-specific Linked Data tools. Presumably such
tools would be coupled with library-specific datasets and/or ontologies.
It seems like the point of Semantic Web architecture is to provide tools
where these assumptions have been factored out. Maybe I'm just not
thinking about it the right way. 

Or maybe this is where Application Profiles are supposed to act as
configuration mechanisms? It seems a little premature to expect a list
of AP-based tools.

Jeff

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ed.summers@gmail.com [mailto:ed.summers@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Ed Summers
> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:22 AM
> To: Young,Jeff (OR)
> Cc: Karen Coyle; public-xg-lld@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Tools
> 
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
> wrote:
> > I started a wiki page for "Tools" where I thought Alex, Michael,
> Martin
> > and I could start to gather thoughts:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Tools#Tools_List
> >
> > Right now this isn't linked from anywhere else.
> >
> > The structure isn't clear yet.
> 
> Are we focusing on Linked Data tools in general, or Library Linked
> Data tools specifically? There are so many options for the former, I'm
> not sure a comprehensive list like this is feasible. Although pointing
> at other good lists could be helpful I guess.
> 
> //Ed
Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 14:33:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 March 2011 14:33:17 GMT