- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 23:14:41 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On 26 Jun 2011, at 19:26, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Hi Jodi, > > Thanks for the useful modifications! > I've put an updated version at > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Comment_Call_Mail > so that it's better to do last-minute updates and keep a reference version. > I've simplified the comment line--anyway, people will use their own subject flavour, so let's keep it short... > > I think there's no need to wait for digress.it to be ready AND the blog to be completely overhauled to fit it. I trust the current situation at http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/ is good enough to reflect the structure. And we're already quite late for this call... Ok. :) You've convinced me. As long as the post URLs won't change! > > The idea is just to be sure that there will be something online by the time we send the call; we can still make updates later, when people will have read the stuff and will be ready to posts their comment. UKOLN turning off their blogs tomorrow is the only thing that prevented me from sending the call now to a couple of lists, in fact ;-) /me nods. :) -Jodi > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > >> >> On 26 Jun 2011, at 17:59, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> For info, here is the current state of the draft call to be sent lists like the ones of http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Dissemination_Lists -- or that you could send personally to potential reviewers. >>> >>> The UKOLN blog will be down tomorrow. *Unless there is an objection before tomorrow, I suggest that as soon as Monica warns us that the blog is up in the air, we can send the call!* >> >> I think if we can first enable digress.it <http://digress.it> and tweak the order of the report that would be better. >> >> I made some edits below. >> First, to (mostly) put bare URLs on lines by themselves -- also making the list be a list of topics, rather than URLs. >> >> Second, I specifically added that there are multiple ways to comment, and put the blog first (mainly since the email comment subject line info is confusing). Maybe it's possible to simplify the comment line info? Even though I agree it's important! >> >> Third, I replaced the start date with "now" -- easier to parse and less likely to need updating! >> >> -Jodi >> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Antoine >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Subject: W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group draft report - Call for Public Comment >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group >>> CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT >>> >>> The W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group (http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/) >>> has been chartered from May 2010 through August 2011 to prepare a series of reports >>> on the existing and potential use of Linked Data technology for publishing >>> library data. The group is currently preparing: >>> >>> -- A report >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion >> which consists of >>> "Benefits" >>> "Vocabularies and Datasets" >>> "Relevant Technologies" >>> "Implementation challenges" >>> "Recommendations" >>> >>> -- "Use Cases", a survey report describing existing projects >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport >>> >>> >>> -- "Vocabularies and Datasets", a survey report >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset >> >>> >>> We (LLD XG) invite comments from interested members of the public. >> >>> Feedback can sent as comments to individual sections posted on our dedicated blog >>> http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/ >>> or by email to a public mailing list >>> (public-lld@w3.org <mailto:public-lld@w3.org>, archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lld/ ) >>> using descriptive subject lines such as: >>> >>> Subject: [COMMENTS] "Benefits" - section on "Benefits to Developers" >>> >>> >>> Comments will be especially welcome in the four weeks from now through 22 >>> July. Reviewers should note that as with Wikipedia, the text may be revised >>> and corrected by its editors in response to comments at any time, but that >>> earlier versions of a document may be viewed by clicking on the History tab. >>> >>> It is anticipated that the three reports will be published in final form by 31 >>> August. >>> >>> >> >
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2011 22:15:11 UTC