- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 15:48:02 +0200
- To: Peter Murray <peter.murray@lyrasis.org>
- Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "public-xg-lld@w3.org" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
* [2011-06-22 07:37:47 -0400] Peter Murray <peter.murray@lyrasis.org> écrit: ] I agree with this recommendation for a neutral position. I also wonder Agreed. ] if there is a point to be made about how RDFa requires the XML ] serialization of HTML5 while Microdata can be done in the less restrictive ] HTML encoding (as well as the XML serialization). Good point, correct in principle but not sure how true this is in practice. As long as it isn't horrifically ill-formed I think you can manage to get RDFa into and out of non-XML HTML5. In other words I think it fails gracefully and works in practice. Aside: I think both RDFa and microthingies are only a bit better than scraping because of the way they mix up data and presentation and are both a lot less convenient than just publishing proper structured data in RDF or XML or whatever. But... Something about tilling at windmills... Cheers, -w -- William Waites <mailto:ww@styx.org> http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww@styx.org> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 13:48:36 UTC