W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > July 2011

Re: Comments on cases

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 15:33:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4E15B5BB.3060508@few.vu.nl>
To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Daniel, (ATTN: all LLD use case owners, as some comments below concern specific cases)

Moving this thread to the XG list -- it may start some internal discussion.

  
>     I'm not able to log in to the W3C blog, but have a few comments on the library linked data use cases.
>
>     1. Social Annotation
>     http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Social_Annotation
>
>     Another example of an existing annotation system can be found at MediaCommons.
>     http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/mcpress/plannedobsolescence/
>     The referenced document demonstrates annotation at the book, chapter, and paragraph levels.
>
>     More use case scenarios:
>     - Annotations can serve as a form of scholarly peer review.
>     - Annotations to draft works in progress can provide suggestions and feedback to the author.
>
>
> I have an open question for today's teleconf, how should we proceed with this kind of comments that are not directly related to the UC report itself but to the clusters or individual use cases. I believe this comments should be reflected on the cluster level (and maybe then in the summarized scenarios in the report) as we have no time to add them as individual use cases right?


It depends on who own the use case, and what is the comment.
For example, the suggestion for more use case scenarios would certainly belong to the cluster level.
The suggestion for a case related to an existing one could be fit into the "related work" section of this existing case. We never hid that we would "curate" the cases. And for many cases the owner is in fact an LLD participant!


>
>     2. Digital Text Repository
>     http://w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Digital_Text_Repository
>
>     Metadata is not the only way, or even the primary way any longer, that text repositories are searched. Full text indexes imply that all terms in the content should be linked to appropriate vocabularies or name authorities.
>
>
>     3. Mendeley Research Networks for linking researchers and publications
>     http://w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Mendeley_Research_Networks_for_linking_researchers_and_publications
>
>     More use case scenarios:
>     - Identify potential peers for collaboration or review.
>     - Identify related papers using semantic correlation, textual similarity, or shared topics.
>
>
>     4. Ranking Search Results by Popularity using Circulation Data
>     http://w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Ranking_Search_Results_by_Popularity_using_Circulation_Data
>
>     Circulation data should include eBook download frequency.
>     Publisher sales data could serve as a supplemental measure of popularity.
>
>
> Again, these seem like ammendments to the individual use cases. Should I reflect it in the use cases or should the uc owners?


I think it's not so much important, who does it. If you feel like doing it, please don't hesitate to. But it would be of course better if the owners did it.

As far as I'm concerned I see a comment on http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Digital_Text_Repository , which is owned by Asaf but was "curated" by me. I'll see what I can do...

Cheers,

Antoine


>
>
>     -- Ron Blanford
>
>     On Jun 28, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Karen Coyle wrote:
>
>>     I want to add a special plea to all of you to take a look at this report and to make any comments that come to mind. I am a member of the W3C LLD group and have had a hand in writing the report, and from that inside viewpoint I can say that it needs more voices. The review format of the blog hopefully makes it easy to make comments with a minimum of effort. This report, *IF* it does a good job of representing what we really need to do to move library data out of the back rooms and onto the front page of the Web, could be instrumental in both organizing our future and helping us secure funding so that we can do what we need to do.
>>
>>     Although the W3C work is aimed at library data, not the intellectual content conserved by libraries, there is a strong relationship between the two that we should explore and exploit in both of these efforts.
>>
>>     kc
>>
>>     Quoting Maura Marx <mmarx@cyber.law.harvard.edu <mailto:mmarx@cyber.law.harvard.edu>>:
>>
>>>     posted by Antoine Isaac of the W3C LLD group -
>>>     Much food for thought re: DPLA
>>>
>>>     "By using Linked Data, memory institutions will create an open, global pool
>>>     of shared data that can be used and re-used to describe resources, with a
>>>     limited amount of redundant effort compared with current cataloguing
>>>     processes..."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     [apologies for cross-posting]
>>>     ------------------------------**------------------------------**----------
>>>     W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group
>>>     CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
>>>
>>>     The W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group (http://www.w3.org/2005/**
>>>     Incubator/lld/ <http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/>)
>>>     has been chartered from May 2010 through August 2011 to prepare a series of
>>>     reports
>>>     on the existing and potential use of Linked Data technology for publishing
>>>     library data. The group is currently preparing:
>>>
>>>     -- A report
>>>     http://www.w3.org/2005/**Incubator/lld/wiki/**DraftReportWithTransclusion<http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportWithTransclusion>
>>>     which consists of
>>>     "Benefits"
>>>     "Vocabularies and Datasets"
>>>     "Relevant Technologies"
>>>     "Implementation challenges"
>>>     "Recommendations"
>>>
>>>     -- "Use Cases", a survey report describing existing projects
>>>     http://www.w3.org/2005/**Incubator/lld/wiki/**UseCaseReport<http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport>
>>>     -- "Vocabularies and Datasets", a survey report
>>>     http://www.w3.org/2005/**Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_**and_Dataset<http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset>
>>>
>>>     We (LLD XG) invite comments from interested members of the public.
>>>
>>>     Feedback can sent as comments to individual sections posted on our dedicated
>>>     blog
>>>     http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/**w3clld/ <http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/>
>>>     or by email to a public mailing list
>>>     (public-lld@w3.org <mailto:public-lld@w3.org>, archived at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**
>>>     Public/public-lld/ <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lld/> )
>>>     using descriptive subject lines such as '[COMMENTS] "Benefits" section'
>>>
>>>     Comments will be especially welcome in the next four weeks (through 22
>>>     July). Reviewers should note that as with Wikipedia, the text may be
>>>     revised
>>>     and corrected by its editors in response to comments at any time, but that
>>>     earlier versions of a document may be viewed by clicking on the History tab.
>>>
>>>     It is anticipated that the three reports will be published in final form by
>>>     31
>>>     August.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     --
>>>
>>>     Maura Marx
>>>     Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet and Society
>>>     Executive Director, Open Knowledge Commons
>>>     ***********************************************************
>>>     direct: 617-384-9131
>>>     mobile: 617-835-3510
>>>     email: mmarx@cyber.law.harvard.edu <mailto:mmarx@cyber.law.harvard.edu>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Karen Coyle
>>     kcoyle@kcoyle.net <mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net> http://kcoyle.net
>>     ph: 1-510-540-7596
>>     m: 1-510-435-8234
>>     skype: kcoylenet
>>
>>     --
>>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Digital Public
>>     Library of America planning initiative listserv.
>>
>>     To post to this group, email dpla-discussion@eon.law.harvard.edu <mailto:dpla-discussion@eon.law.harvard.edu>
>>     To unsubscribe from this group, visit
>>     https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/signoff/dpla-discussion
>>     To edit your subscription options, visit
>>     https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/suboptions/dpla-discussion
>>     A searchable archive of all messages is available at
>>     https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/arc/dpla-discussion
>>
>>     We encourage you to post your ideas and resources to the DPLA public wiki:
>>     https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/dpla/Main_Page
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>     --
>     You received this message because you are subscribed to the Digital Public
>     Library of America planning initiative listserv.
>
>     To post to this group, email dpla-discussion@eon.law.harvard.edu <mailto:dpla-discussion@eon.law.harvard.edu>
>     To unsubscribe from this group, visit
>     https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/signoff/dpla-discussion
>     To edit your subscription options, visit
>     https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/suboptions/dpla-discussion
>     A searchable archive of all messages is available at
>     https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/lists/arc/dpla-discussion
>
>     We encourage you to post your ideas and resources to the DPLA public wiki:
>     https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/dpla/Main_Page
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 7 July 2011 13:32:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 7 July 2011 13:32:53 GMT